Archive

Author Archives:

Starting with issue #260.1, Christos Gage took over X-Men Legacy from the title’s long-serving writer Mike Carey, who has probably done more for the franchise than anyone since Grant Morrison exited New X-Men back in 2004. Gage’s first issue suffered from a few problems: the need to establish the cast of characters he’ll be using going forward got in the way of the story’s structure to some extent, the writing occasionally lapsed into cliche, and at times it felt as though he was trying a little too hard to make an impression. However, three issues in and he’s definitely found his voice. If Uncanny X-Men is a traditional superhero comic and Wolverine and the X-Men is overblown fun, X-Men Legacy looks set to be the soap opera book, following on in the grand tradition established by Chris Claremont, and that’s as good a function as any for it to serve in an already crowded line.

The current storyline sees the team pitched against Exodus, who – like many superhero villains – has been defeated so often and so decisively that it’s difficult to take the declarations of his supposedly unstoppable power seriously. As tends to be the case when he appears, he plays the role of self-anointed mutant saviour (despite the fact that he’s never done one thing to actually help the species), and Gage does a good job of rehabilitating him, making him interesting to old and new readers alike. On art, David Baldeon is well suited to the material; his facial expressions could benefit from a little more emotion and variety, but he’s certainly one to watch. The buzz around this one is growing, and I’m only too happy to validate it.

X-Factor has for years now been Peter David’s corner of the X-universe, with the writer (almost) free to do as he pleases, consistently taking unpromising characters and making the reader care about them. His stint on the title has had its ups and downs, with some story arcs more successful than others, but he’s built up a loyal audience, which is why X-Factor has avoided cancellation despite being a low seller. When the X-Men brand undergoes one of its frequent relaunches/reshuffles, David generally pays lip service to it, and that was certainly the case in They Keep Killing Madrox, the tale running through issues #229 to #232. Unfortunately, the arc fell a little flat, despite having such a wonderful name.

The positives: well, Emanuela Lupacchino is a spectacular superhero artist, and will propel herself to the A-list sooner or later if she maintains the high standard of these issues. On the writing side, by this point David has full command of his characters, and has worked hard to develop a unique voice for each and every one. That sense of identity is really beneficial in a team book setting, where even the best writers can sometimes struggle to differentiate the voices of each individual. On the downside, in this arc his pacing and structure isn’t always effective. Issue #230 is the only one that features all of the book’s extended cast, and yet barely features Madrox at all; when read in one go, the effect is particularly jarring, as the flow of the main story grinds to a halt so that the other characters can stand around and argue a lot, before the final page then introduces two major new additions who don’t feature at all in #231 and #232. It’s possible that the Regenesis initiative interrupted David’s intended narrative to some extent, and the work that eventually surfaced was subject to a few last minute changes. Even so, at four issues the story feels overlong and inconsequential, as though the book is treading water ahead of whatever comes next. That will be the real test for X-Factor, and it will need to justify its place in the line once more.

And finally, there is Uncanny X-Force. Disappointingly, I appear to have jumped on at the wrong time. Issue #19 was essentially a postscript to the critically acclaimed Dark Angel Saga, and in the last three issues Rick Remender has been telling the story of Otherworld, a magical realm based on Celtic and Welsh mythology. The mix of this fantastical element and the title’s modus operandi of grim and gritty, violent antics has proven interesting but ultimately unsuccessful, and a large part of the problem has been Greg Tocchini’s art. To be charitable, his work could be described as an acquired taste; his influences are clearly more interesting that your average comicbook artist, touching upon impressionism and other staples of art history. Taking a less generous stance, one could argue that the work featured in issues #20 and #21 had no business being published, given its lack of clarity and detail. Issue #22 is fortunately a vast improvement, and if he could raise the bar just a little and then operate at that standard consistently, he’d be one hell of a talent. He was presumably chosen for this story arc because of the almost dream-like qualities Otherworld is supposed to evoke. However, when he’s called upon to deliver a particularly gory scene in issue #22 (spoiler: one of the characters loses their face) he can’t pull it off. His style simply doesn’t suit the hyperviolence that is supposed to be a part of the book’s high concept.

As for the story? Well, it has been underwhelming so far, to be honest. The setting and stakes aren’t particularly interesting; Otherworld rarely crops up in the Marvel universe, and most of the individuals who inhabit it are so minor it’s hard to care about their fates, or else they’re C-level superheroes that, regardless of the outcome, will crop up in someone else’s story in a few months time, ostensibly unchanged by the events of this tale. Like X-Factor, Uncanny X-Force seems to be killing time, and hopefully the next arc will be a return to form.

So in summary: X-Men Legacy stands out as the best of the satellite titles; it doesn’t quite achieve the same level of quality as Uncanny X-Men and Wolverine and the X-Men, but it’s up there. As for X-Factor and Uncanny X-Force, wait and see: the talent involved with both titles have delivered in the past, and hopefully the next storylines will be an improvement over the current ones.

In which we consider the increasing homogenisation of Manchester’s bar scene.

At the start of the year it was announced that Zecol, the company that operates the Trof chain, had taken over The Green Room and Albert Hall Brannigans, two sites that had fallen into disuse some months earlier. In an interview with Manchester Confidential, Zecol managing director Joel Wilkinson spoke of the company’s plans: “We need to decide on the look and feel we’re going to give the place, although it won’t be radically different to the rest of the Trof bars.”

Little over a month later, a similar story emerged. The success of Black Dog Ballroom has prompted the owners to take over the vacant Pure Space site on New Wakefield Street. Ross Mackenzie, one of the two men behind the Northern Quarter venue, has already suggested that the new venue will seek to replicate the original, with his long-term goal involving establishing the brand across North England.

These developments raise an interesting question: can this kind of homogeneity really be a good thing for the city?

The success of the likes of Trof and Black Dog strikes me as a double-edged sword. The fact that these businesses are expanding is good news for the city economically (and any development that helps create new jobs should be celebrated); however, as far as Manchester’s social scene is concerned it does nothing to improve choice: we simply get an almost identikit version of an established brand popping up in a new location. More of the same, in other words. The Northern Quarter Black Dog serves its purpose and its clientele just fine; is it really necessary to open another one just a 20 minute walk away?

Similarly, does the city centre really need FOUR Trof venues if each one is going to be utilising the same approach and aesthetic? Is it not in danger of becoming a Wetherspoon’s for the alternative set?

I’m aware than an argument could be made that these companies are taking over failed sites, revitalising venues that weren’t able to remain open in the current climate. Which is a perfectly fair point. However, Trof and Black Dog grew to thrive because they brought something new to the table, offering a different kind of night out and unique selling points that pack the punters in. The pair stand as proof that new ideas can succeed. If there’s room in the city’s social scene for popular outlets to expand, surely there’s room for original concepts to take off? In particular, the success of the likes of Black Dog and Port Street Beer House against a difficult economic backdrop suggests that there is.

The Green Room and Space are fantastic venues, and the news that both will soon be back in commission is most welcome indeed. Here’s hoping that Trof and Black Dog show a willingness to try something new and take a few risks, rather than simply resting on their laurels.

As is customary in January, I’ve found it hard to settle into a book for any significant amount of time, flitting from one piece of literature to another on whims, leaving a good few in progress even though I was enjoying them. Give it another month and maybe I’ll have found my focus.

I started the year finishing off Moneyball, Michael Lewis’s fantastic book about Billy Beane, the general manager who revolutionised baseball by focusing on approaches to talent spotting and team selection than no-one else put any stock in. His methods helped transform the Oakland Athletics from an unsuccessful outfit to regular playoff contenders; interestingly enough, the success of his methods – not to mention of Moneyball – led to other individuals adopting them wholesale, and in recent years Beane’s team has struggled.

The story that unfolds is far from a conventional sports narrative, however, and the way Lewis tells it is somewhat out of the ordinary too. Rather than following a linear path, Lewis jumps back and forth, sometimes without warning, and allows himself any number of diversions and meandering interludes, all the while crediting the reader with enough intelligence to keep up. Some of the most illuminating passages involve Beane’s new guard clashing against baseball’s old guard, be it coaching staff, scouts, or sportswriters, all of whom are strongly resistant to the new ideas of the upstarts. Prior knowledge of baseball is not necessary to enjoy Lewis’s account.

I also picked up Everything’s Fine, the promising debut from Manchester’s own Socrates Adams. Literature that is actually laugh-out-loud funny is a rare thing indeed, yet Adams delivers in spades on the humour front. Which is a good job, really, because the focus of the story – a man named Ian’s workplace-based woes and general failure to function as proper adults are expected to - does not allow for much light to filter in, his dream of a holiday to the French alps notwithstanding.

Adams seems to have found his particular milieu, marrying mundane slice of life material with surrealism and the odd shock tactic, as well as social commentary that may or may not be earnest. It’s an effective blend, and certainly a unique one – it seems safe to say I’ll read nothing quite like Everything’s Fine again this year. The simple conceit does become ever-so-slightly stretched at points, tasked with carrying an entire novel (well, novella might be more accurate), but that doesn’t detract too much. Given its subject matter, it’s likely that a good few of you will readily be able to relate to the trials and tribulations of Ian. If nothing else, it’s worth reading because it’s likely to be the only time you experience a narrative in which a length of pipe is the most sympathetic character.

I rounded off the month with Stephen King’s Misery, the tale of Paul Sheldon, a writer famous for a series of bestsellers starring Misery Chastain. When Paul suffers a car crash, he’s rescued from the wreckage by Annie Wilkes, who just so happens to be Misery’s biggest fan. Problem is, Paul killed her in his last novel, and Annie’s grasp on sanity is tenuous at best…

Misery is a gripping, ambitious tale, one that King uses to explore what it means to be an artist, how possessive and demanding fans can become, and whether or not releasing a work of art commercially means it belongs to the public as much as the person who created it. In one glorious passage, Sheldon ponders to himself:

“It was crazy. It was funny. It was also real. Millions might scoff, but only because they failed to realize how pervasive the influence of art – even of such a degenerate sort as popular fiction – could become. Housewives arranged their schedules around the afternoon soaps. If they went back into the workplace, they made buying a VCR a top priority so they could watch those same soap operas at night. When Arthur Conan Doyle killed Sherlock Holmes at Reichenbach Falls, all of Victorian England rose as one and demanded him back. The tone of their protests had been Annie’s exactly – not bereavement but outrage. Doyle was berated by his own mother when he wrote and told her of his intention to do away with Holmes. Her indignant reply had come by return mail: ‘Kill that nice Mr Holmes? Foolishness! Don’t you dare!‘”

The passage continues, and is a wonderful, profound ode to the all-consuming effect art can have on us, how passionate a person can become over a fictional character, and why we’re willing to invest so much of ourselves into worlds that do not exist. As it turns out, it’s only easy to dismiss King as populist fare if you’ve never read one of his better novels. I’ll certainly be seeking out more.

Currently reading: The Woman in White by Wilkie Collins, Jacobs Beach by Kevin Mitchell, Retromania: Pop Culture’s Addiction to its Own Past by Simon Reynolds, and Infinite Jest by David Foster Wallace.

Next on the agenda: Finishing all of the above and reading The Melancholy of Resistance by Laszlo Krasznahorkai for February’s book club.

How goes the novel?: After a strong first week, things ground to a halt. It’s currently ‘on the shelf’ as I ‘concentrate on other projects.’

So, time to catch up with Regenesis, which by now has had plenty enough time to make its mark. It’s fair to say the relaunch has offered its share of both good news and bad news. First, the bad news: Marvel still insists on publishing superfluous titles that have no compelling reason to exist, and in fact serve to dilute the entire line. New Mutants and Generation Hope are not bad comicbooks, but their existence seems predicated on the knowledge that completists will likely pick them up, rather than any pressing creative or artistic need to tell a story. Ultimately, it’s serviceable genre fare that I’ve already stopped purchasing.

X-Men doesn’t deserve to get off so lightly.  Victor Gischler – who has proven elsewhere that he is a perfectly talented writer – has been dragging out a story for four issues that could’ve been wrapped up in two. It got off to a bad start by utilising the ‘superheroes fight following a misunderstanding, then team up to take on the bad guys’ template that is as old as the genre, and thus overused to such an extent that the only suitable reaction is a cataclysmic yawn. Meanwhile, the plot is all-too-familiar: an upstart nation gets its hands on advanced technology (in this case, Sentinels), ostensibly in order to better protect its borders from international threats, but in reality to go on the offensive. What would be fine as a b-plot (or even c-plot) seems interminable at this length, and I won’t be sticking round for future issues.

Fortunately, the good news is that the two flagship titles have been excellent. Wolverine and the X-Men has given the line a shot in the arm, with Jason Aaron seemingly having no interest in the “grim and gritty” storylines that have come to define the franchise (all death and dystopian futures). Instead, he’s penning a silly little action book of the best kind, one that embraces the more ridiculous and outre genre conventions and ramps them up to 11. To this end, the villains of the first arc were the latest version of the Hellfire Club, a collection of prepubescent sociopaths with too much time and money on their hands and an intense hatred of mutantkind. Moving at a brisk pace, the hero of the piece turns out to be teen anarchistic and reluctant member of Wolverine’s Jean Grey School for Higher Learning Quentin Quire, a Grant Morrison creation whose sensibilities mesh perfectly with Aaron’s. Fantastic stuff.

The first Uncanny X-Men story arc was no less impressive. Kieron Gillen – who cut his teeth writing the Britpop-inspired Phonogram – writes an excellent Cyclops, and it should be interesting to see how his X-Men team (which comprises several individuals of morally dubious character, including Magneto) manage to co-exist. Their role is twofold: to help humanity, but also to show them how powerful mutants really are, and what a bad idea it is to mess with the species. It’s an interesting setup, helped by the fact that they were pitted against Mister Sinister, with Gillen successfully redefining the role and purpose of a villain who has for too long been shrouded in pointless mystery and ambiguity. On art, Carlos Pacheco is on top form, turning in his most impressive work in recent memory. The two should be commended for embracing the superhero team book template and making it seem vital again.

So in summary: seek out the first three issues of both Wolverine and the X-Men and Uncanny X-Men, and skip the other three titles I’ve discussed. Next time out, we’ll look at whether X-Men Legacy, Uncanny X-Force, and X-Factor are worth a read.

Did you read My Life In Comicbooks? You did? Okay, let’s get to it then!

The recent X-Men: Schism miniseries tore a rift in the very heart of the X-Men, and resulted in an ideological split between Cyclops and Wolverine. The reason? As always, to sell more comics. But, cynicism aside, splitting the mutants into two different camps does make a lot of sense; in theory, it should allow each title to focus on character-driven stories, something that has been lacking at times in recent years.

As the title tasked with establishing the new direction, X-Men: Regenesis #1 is best viewed as a necessity, one that puts the relevant pieces into place for what comes next. Outside of that remit, it does little to dazzle. In particular, the decision to use a tribal gathering as a metaphor for the split between Cyclops and Wolverine is massively misjudged; it adds nothing to the story, and thematically it is a tenuous fit at best, coming across as a cheap attempt to add some action to an issue that is otherwise entirely devoted to talking heads. Still, the conversation scenes are well-written, and carry the kind of weight you would hope for, given they are supposed to sell the important nature of the decisions being made. Some strong character scenes lift this into above average territory.

Rather than doing anything dramatically different, Wolverine and the X-Men #1 follows a rather tried and true approach (calling to mind, for example, Grant Morrison’s Riot at Xavier’s arc), and yet still manages to feel like a breath of fresh air. That’s largely down to the injection of a sense of humour; X-Men comics are typically handwringing affairs, what with the constant deaths and victories that look more like defeats. Jason Aaron undoubtedly has a handle on the characters, with his version of Beast (as a super-genius far too occupied with his intellect to pay attention to anyone or anything else) feeling as true to the character as any in recent years. Chris Bachalo’s art tends to be an acquired taste, but I’ve always been a big fan of his brand of hyper-expressiveness, and the bright colour palettes inkers tend to use for his work. The clarity of the splash page that ends the issue could be questioned; the villain is ambiguous in a way I’m not convinced is intentional. But that’s a minor quibble. and other than that this is an excellent first issue.

The senses-shattering introduction to Onward, Manchester’s coverage of the X-Men relaunch.

When you’re still in single digit ages, your life pretty much revolves around cartoons. Or at least mine did. Nothing, however, grabbed me quite the way X-Men: The Animated Series did. Complex characters with inner turmoils; it seemed like a massive step up from my usual fare. I was quickly hooked.

From those humble origins my love of comicbooks did blossom. Arcadia Comics opened up in Ashton-under-Lyne in 1994, at exactly the right time to foster my interest and capture the majority of my pocket money. Eschewing the rest of the Marvel line (with the exception of the odd Spider-man comic here and there) and ignoring DC Comics altogether, my focus was very much on the X-Men, and its labyrinthine continuity.

As I progressed through high school, I stopped visiting, for fear of being associated with a medium that might be viewed as “uncool.” By the time college rolled around, however, my love of the written word had become all-encompassing, and eventually led me towards a couple of critically acclaimed graphic novels, Blankets by Craig Thompson and Maus by Art Spiegelman (both of which fall into “must read before you die” territory). I sought out everything I could, discovering Scott Pilgrim before there was a bandwagon to jump upon, delighting in the work of the Hernandez Brothers, and digging Daniel Clowes’ worldview.

Eventually, this path led me back to superhero comicbooks, and even back to Arcadia, and its rows upon rows of back issues from the era I cared about the most. Being employed, I could afford to be more extravagant (splashing upwards of £30 on Uncanny X-Men #266, the first appearance of Gambit, for example), and used to depart the store with epic hauls. During a Jeffrey Brown book signing I discovered that OK Comics in Leeds was also well-stocked in that department, so I made a pilgrimage or two when I could find the time.

By 2006, eBay had replaced the need for me to travel out of the city centre for back issues. The proprietor of Arcadia (which had closed down one year previously) was arrested and charged for an unsolved murder, for which an innocent man had served 16 years in jail for. My interest has waxed and waned over the last decade, usually in sync with my bank balance, but something always brings me back. I almost caved when DC relaunched its entire line in September; the X-Men relaunch proved impossible to resist.

So here I am. Back on the hook. So very glad you chose to join me.

Coming soon: reviews of X-Men: Regenesis, Wolverine and the X-Men #1, and plenty more besides!

In response to Vampire Weekend’s question: I do. At first only because I was paid to, but before long I came around to the Oxford comma’s way of thinking, and now cannot stand to see it absent. For the uninitiated, said comma is used immediately before a co-ordinating conjunction in a list of three or more items (as illustrated in the picture above); it was introduced to aid clarity and to improve the flow of potentially cluttered sentences. However, people have argued over its usage since it first appeared.

In recent months, to use or not to use the Oxford comma has once again become the grammatical issue du jour; of course, it should be noted that coverage hasn’t extended much further than the broadsheets’ blogs, which gives you an idea as to how much the debate actually matters. Some lamented its supposed death, others who didn’t believe that it had expired called for its death, whilst others still suggested that common sense should be allowed to prevail (a ridiculous notion, I know), and that people should just use it when they feel its necessary.

Me, I’ve come to use it almost as a matter of course, not just in my work but in everything I write. For my money, it helps give equal weight to each item listed in a sentence. It also helps avoid confusion and ambiguity, as wonderfully illustrated by The Gloss.

I was never quite this precious about language before, but since finding work as an (associate) editor the way I see language, grammar, and punctuation has changed. More than ever, I am struck by the brilliance of the comma, and convinced that, in the right hands, its usage constitutes an artform all of its own. So much so, in fact, that I recently had to abandon my attempt at reading Cormac McCarthy’s All The Pretty Horses, because of his stylistic decision to all but avoid punctuation.

For an American-born writer, that’s practically sacrilege; despite having its origins in the famous university, it is the US where the Oxford comma is viewed as mandatory. It is not the only feature of American English I admire, either; the likes of “honour” and “labour” have always struck me as ugly words, yet when the superfluous “u” is removed they become much more palatable. The Yanks also gave the letter “z” something meaningful to do, rather than just let it sit on the end of the alphabet like a lazy freeloader.

Language is supposed to constantly evolve, but in recent years that evolution has focused on the creation of ever more ridiculous words and their subsequent addition to whichever dictionaries are most desperate for publicity. I would begrudgingly accept this country’s right to allow phrases as asinine as “mankle” and “fash pack” to enter the lexicon, would it only give something back; the sacrifice of a “u” here and there, the abolition of the “st” on the end of “whilst,” “amongst,” and “amidst.” A small price to pay on the road towards common ground.

But of course, this is England, and we have a deep appreciation for protecting pointless things to the death as a matter of principle, regardless of whether the battle is actually worth fighting. I’ve long since come to terms with that. If people want to defend their honour – or labour a point – they are welcome to do so. And if people don’t have the time to write or to say “food memoir,” they can go ahead and use “foodoir” instead. Just don’t take away my Oxford commas, okay?

“Things can only get better” – D:Ream, “Things Can Only Get Better”

Where were we? Oh yes, I remember: no fans, no record deal, no point. That’s where we stood at the end of 2007.

Of course, it can be difficult to let go sometimes, and we weren’t willing to do so just yet. Despite having experienced a complete lack of success, we still thought highly enough of ourselves and of the music we were making to keep working at it. What that meant, as always, was locking ourselves away in our practise room.

By this point we were rehearsing in a damn-near derelict old mill located on, appropriately enough, Old Mill Street in Ancoats, and I can say with some conviction that we were dedicated. We turned up there Christmas Eve morning, planning to put a full day in, only to find that for once the place had been properly locked up. To be honest, I was relieved; I’d just finished the last of my 10pm till 8am shifts as a temp at Toys R Us. Playing music was the last thing on my mind, given that the preceding two months had been an exercise in draining every last trace of joy out of my life. 50 hour weeks working unsociable shifts will do that to a person.

Anyway, one of our biggest problems was always a complete inability to self-promote. Other bands make creating buzz seem effortless (although it should be noted that many actually hire someone to do the work for them), but we laboured at it without success. You could be writing some of the greatest songs of all time, but if no-one gets the chance to hear them that doesn’t count for anything. “If a tree falls in the woods” and all that. Naturally, this in no way deterred us from spending money we couldn’t really afford on studio time.

Early in 2008 we entered the studio for the fourth time. The previous sessions had never gone that well. The first was a rush job, and involved getting down four tracks in an epic single session just so that we’d have something to shop ourselves around with. The second was slightly more relaxed, but we still weren’t all that happy with the results. In the immediate aftermath of both, we ended up writing much better songs, meaning that the recorded material was disowned. Still, we handcrafted a small amount of CDs and managed to sell them at our gigs, meaning that somewhere in this city a few copies must still be dotted around.

Alas, third time was not the charm. If things don’t click quickly in the studio, then it soon becomes a nightmare. A late start on the first day was followed by various complications and malfunctions. I had to play my parts again, and again, and again, until they had lost all meaning. As did everyone else. We became more and more dispirited and started losing all patience with one another, and in the end were just glad when it was over, regardless of how anything sounded. Months later, after I had finally quit the band, I had a habit of bumping into the guy who had helped engineer the session, and every time he would tell me how much he hated our lead guitarist’s vocals.

In comparison, then, the fourth session was a joy. The setup for the drums was perfect, and I banged out my parts with a minimum of fuss, and then happily disengaged my brain from the boredom of the process as everyone else laid down theirs. It went very well indeed, and we came out with two songs that were of “professional” quality. We were thrilled, and felt that this time, we could definitely find a label – local or otherwise – that would want to put them out.

We were wrong.

In part four: time to call it a day.

There is always a value to taking oneself out of the cultural comfort zone. A modern day retelling of the tale of Narcissus and Echo, through the medium of chamber opera, is some way removed from my typical night out, but let it not be said that I am becoming complacement in my advancing years. This was the first premiere I had ever been invited to attend, and slight fears about the possible incomprehensibility of the material aside, I was determined to make the most of it.

As it happened, I needn’t have worried. A familiriaty with the myth upon which Narcissus and Echo is based made the plot easy to understand, and the contemporary elements – Narcissus is recast as a celebrity figure who is as obsessed with himself as the papparazzi who pursue him – is clever without being intrusive. That’s largely due to David Sheppard’s portrayal of the character, which allows notes of sensitivity to shine through the vanity.

Lizzie Marshall is even more impressive, capturing the overwhelming strength of Echo’s attraction to Narcissus, and the futility of it too. The nymphs – in this case the journalists who hound Narcissus - provide the comic relief, stumbling over one another in a manner rarely seen outside of a 1920s silent film, and singing into their dictaphones; however, in true tabloid fashion they are complicit in his fate, and thus cannot be written off as the proverbial jokers of the piece.

The performers are accompanied by a fantastic group of musicians; their first notes are wonderfully jarring, the discordant rhythms helping to build a sense of urgency and turmoil that is occasionally interrupted by moments of calm, which create an air of beauty and pathos. Composer Anja Djordjevic should be congratulated for her score, which is captivating throughout, and gives the narrative room to breathe.

The finale subverts the traditional mythology slightly, although it still ends the only way it can, the way so many classic love stories end: a powerful warning that emotional extremes – be they selfish or selfless - can be perfectly destructive. But a sense of inevitability doesn’t matter one bit if the journey is enthralling, and Narcissus and Echo certainly delivers on that front.

It’s pretty much a truism that every small-time indie band you could care to mention is going to be composed of three to five shy and awkward individuals who are in no way cut out to be placed upon a stage in front of other people. So to say that we were terrified on the day of our first gig seems redundant. Also, it’s a massive understatement: we were in a state of near-panic over all the things that could, and likely would, go wrong.

It didn’t help that by this point, we’d accumulated an ungodly amount of instruments and equipment. To compound the problem further, some of the drum machines and keyboards we had incorporated into our act were liable to stop working if you so much as brushed against them the wrong way. A recipe for disaster if ever there was one.

After a not entirely promising soundcheck, and with our nerves on a knife edge, we took to the stage, doing our very best to avoid eye contact with the audience; one bored or disinterested look would likely have destroyed us. Once you’re up there, there’s nothing to do but play…

It wasn’t a flawless performance by any stretch, but we carried it off well enough, and the folks who saw it seemed to enjoy it. It was a start, at any rate, one we quickly followed up on a month later with a much improved showing at Joshua Brooks. Everything went right for us, from the sound on the stage to the enthusiasm of those who’d showed up. The Manchester Music review was flattering to say the least; we were dubbed “one of Manchester’s most exciting newcomers for 2006.” High praise indeed, and there were still nine months of the year left to go.

We spent the year attempting to build on those kind words, by gigging whenever we could, wherever we could, and locking ourselves away in whatever spaces we could find to work on new and better songs. We closed out the year triumphantly enough, appearing on the High Voltage compilation, Full Charge, and felt poised to push on further.

Alas, 2007 was an exercise in standing still. We still received plenty of positive reviews, but our gigs were almost always populated by no more than a handful of people. We got some great support slots – with Subtle at the Bierkeller, with Danielson at the Levenshulme Bowling Social Club on a bill that also included Los Campesinos! – but even those made no difference to our fortunes, and with Twitter still in its formative stages, creating word of mouth seemed like the hardest thing in the world. No matter that we were “glitch ridden intelli pop of the highest order” (Subba-Cultcha’s words) with a “frail and fractured, dreamy and downbeat sound” (Is This Music?). We were going nowhere fast.

It isn’t difficult to remember rock bottom. Let me tell you, the Dry Bar basement is a lonely place to be when the band members outnumber the audience. It sends you into a spiral of “are we actually not very good?” doubt and despondency. If creating and sharing music is supposed to be fun, then performing live to a room of four people is the surest way of ruining that feeling. No-one wanted to come to our gigs, no-one wanted to put out our music. Sometimes it’s hard to carry on…

In part three: things fail to get better before getting worse.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 35 other followers